When police capture suspects, which statement about confessions is true?

When police capture suspects, which statement about confessions is true?

• A. Confessions can be introduced as evidence even if later denied.
• B. Confessions are never admissible.
• C. False confessions are not possible.
• D. Confessions are always voluntary.

Answer: (A)

The point being tested is how confession evidence is treated in court. If a confession is obtained through lawful, voluntary means, it can be introduced at trial as evidence even if the suspect later denies having made it. The key is voluntariness and proper procedure; the defense can challenge the confession on grounds of coercion, promises, or misrepresentation, and the judge may suppress it if it wasn’t voluntary. But a voluntary confession, once obtained, remains admissible regardless of the suspect’s later denial, and the jury weighs its credibility along with other evidence. The other statements don’t fit: confessions are not categorically inadmissible; false confessions can occur, and confessions are not guaranteed to be voluntary—coercive or involuntary confessions may be excluded.

The point being tested is how confession evidence is treated in court. If a confession is obtained through lawful, voluntary means, it can be introduced at trial as evidence even if the suspect later denies having made it. The key is voluntariness and proper procedure; the defense can challenge the confession on grounds of coercion, promises, or misrepresentation, and the judge may suppress it if it wasn’t voluntary. But a voluntary confession, once obtained, remains admissible regardless of the suspect’s later denial, and the jury weighs its credibility along with other evidence.

The other statements don’t fit: confessions are not categorically inadmissible; false confessions can occur, and confessions are not guaranteed to be voluntary—coercive or involuntary confessions may be excluded.